Abstract:Objective To establish and validate a clinical scoring system for predicting the technical difficulty of endoscopic resection of submucosal tumors (SMT) in the cardia. Methods A total of 246 patients with cardiac SMT who underwent endoscopic resection at Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University from July 2017 to March 2021 were enrolled. They were divided into technically difficult (n=21) and non‑difficult (n=225) groups, potential risk factors with significant differences between the two groups were screened by univariate analysis. All 246 patients were randomly divided into training (n=123) and internal validation (n=123) cohorts. Based on the training cohort, the independent risk factors influencing technical difficulty were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis, and corresponding scores were assigned to construct the scoring system and its efficacy was evaluated. External validation of the scoring system was performed using clinical data from 31 similar patients at Zhangjiagang First People""s Hospital. Results Univariate analysis showed that gender, growth pattern, morphology, long diameter, and gastroscopic viewing direction were potential risk factors for technical difficulty in endoscopic resection of cardiac SMT (P<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis in the training cohort further confirmed that male sex (P=0.026, OR=0.154, 95%CI: 0.023‑0.683), extraluminal growth (P=0.005, OR=0.040, 95%CI:0.004‑0.366), and long diameter ≥3 cm (P=0.005, OR=0.072, 95%CI: 0.009‑0.392) were independent risk factors for technical difficulty. Two points were assigned to male sex, 3 to extraluminal growth, and 3 to long diameter ≥3 cm. The technical difficulty was classified into four grades based on the total score: easy (0 point), moderate (1‑3 points), difficult (4‑6 points), and very difficult (>6 points). The incidence rates of technical difficulty in each grade of the training cohort were 0.0% (0/39), 6.8% (4/59), 33.3% (8/24), and 100.0% (1/1), respectively, while those in the internal validation cohort were 0.0% (0/49), 5.6% (3/54), 22.2% (4/18), and 50.0% (1/2), respectively. Efficacy verification of the scoring system showed that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for internal validation was 0.860 (95%CI: 0.763‑0.958) with good calibration in the Hosmer‑Lemeshow test (P=0.979). The AUC for external validation was 0.798 (95%CI: 0.632‑0.965). Conclusion The scoring system constructed based on the male sex, extraluminal growth, and long diameter ≥3 cm can effectively predict the technical difficulty of endoscopic resection of cardiac SMT, and offers a practical tool for clinical decision‑making.