重复超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术的临床价值
作者:
作者单位:

1.山东阳光融和医院消化内科 潍坊;2.山东大学齐鲁医院消化内科 济南

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金(82261160396);泰山学者工程专项经费(tsqn202306344);山东大学临床研究项目(2021SDUCRCB004)


Clinical value of repeated endoscopic ultrasound⁃guided fine⁃needle aspiration
Author:
Affiliation:

Shandong sunshine union hospital

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China (82261160396); Taishan Scholars Project Special Funds (tsqn202306344); Clinical Research Program of Shandong University (2021SDUCRCB004)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探讨重复超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术(endoscopic ultrasound⁃guided fine needle aspiration,EUS⁃FNA)在疑诊肿瘤性病变患者中的诊断价值。方法 收集山东大学齐鲁医院消化内镜中心2018年1月至2023年10月期间因临床疑诊肿瘤性病变行首次EUS⁃FNA不能获得明确的疾病诊断而行重复EUS⁃FNA的所有病例,回顾超声内镜图像、病理、随访转归等病例资料,分析经重复EUS⁃FNA得到明确诊断的患者,评估重复EUS⁃FNA对肿瘤性病变的诊断敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率。结果 共有36例不同部位占位性病变患者纳入研究,最终80.6%(29/36)诊断为肿瘤性病变,19.4%(7/36)为非肿瘤性病变,其中34例患者得到明确病种诊断。重复EUS⁃FNA诊断肿瘤性病变灵敏度为82.8%(24/29),特异度为100.0%(7/7),阳性预测值为100.0%(24/24),阴性预测值为58.3%(7/12),准确率为86.1%(31/36)。结论 临床疑诊肿瘤性病变而首次EUS⁃FNA病理结果不明确时,重复EUS⁃FNA是有效可行的方法。

    Abstract:

    Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in patients with suspected neoplastic lesions. Methods Patients with clinically suspected neoplastic lesions, who did not receive a definitive diagnosis following the initial EUS-FNA and subsequently underwent repeated EUS-FNA, were collected from the gastrointestinal endoscopy center of Qilu Hospital of Shandong University from January 2018 to October 2023. The ultrasonographic endoscopic images, pathology, and follow-up data were reviewed. Patients with confirmed diagnoses following repeated EUS-FNA were analyzed to determine the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of repeat EUS-FNA for tumor and non-neoplastic lesions. Results A total of 36 patients with space-occupying lesions in different parts were included in the study, and the final diagnosis was 80.6% (29/36) of tumor lesions and 19.4% (7/36) of non-tumor lesions. Among these, 34 patients received definitive diagnoses. The diagnostic sensitivity of repeated EUS-FNA for tumor was 82.8% (24/29), the specificity was 100.0% (7/7), the positive predictive value was 100.0% (24/24), the negative predictive value was 58.3% (7/12), and the accuracy was 86.1% (31/36). Conclusion Repeated EUS-FNA proves to be an effective and practical approach for cases where is suspicion of neoplastic lesions and the initial EUS-FNA pathology findings remain inconclusive.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

高军,许新彦,马瑞光,等.重复超声内镜引导细针穿刺抽吸术的临床价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2025,42(3):207-211.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-12-08
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-26
  • 录用日期:2024-01-19
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-28
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司