内镜下多环套扎治疗难治性胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝的临床初探(含视频)
作者:
作者单位:

1.内蒙古医科大学附属医院消化内科;2.北京大学肿瘤医院内蒙古医院内镜中心

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(82460118);内蒙古自治区自然科学基金面上项目(2024MS08002);内蒙古自治区医师协会临床医学研究和临床新技术推广项目(YSXH2024KYF068);北京大学肿瘤医院内蒙古医院高水平临床专科建设重大项目(2024YNZD002);内蒙古医科大学重点项目(YKD2023ZD001);内蒙古医学科学院公立医院科研联合基金项目(2024GLLH0390)


Preliminary clinical observations on endoscopic multi‑band ligation for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease combined with esophageal hiatal hernia (with video)
Author:
Affiliation:

Department of Digestive Diseases, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University

Fund Project:

National Natural Science Foundation of China Regional Science Foundation Project (82460118); General Project of Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region (2024MS08002); Clinical Medical Research and Promotion of New Clinical Technologies Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Physician Association (YSXH2024KYF068); Major Project for High Level Clinical Specialty Construction of Peking University Cancer Hospital Inner Mongolia Hospital (2024YNZD002); Key Project of Inner Mongolia Medical University (YKD2023ZD001); Research Joint Fund Project of Public Hospitals of Inner Mongolia Academy of Medical Sciences (2024GLLH0390)

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的 探索内镜下多环套扎(endoscopic multi‑band ligation,EMBL)治疗难治性胃食管反流病(refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease,RGERD)合并食管裂孔疝(hiatal hernia,HH)的临床疗效及安全性。方法 本研究为前瞻性多中心小样本队列研究,选择2020年1月至2022年6月在内蒙古医科大学附属肿瘤医院确诊为RGERD合并HH的患者行EMBL,比较手术前后食管24 h pH监测和食管高分辨率测压(high resolution manometry,HRM)相关指标、胃食管反流指数(gastroesophageal reflux index,GERI)、胃食管反流病问卷调查量表(gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire,GERD‑Q)评分、胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量(gastroesophageal reflux disease health‑related quality of life,GERD‑HRQL)评分,调查患者的满意程度及并发症情况。结果 共纳入25例患者,均成功接受EMBL治疗,患者反流症状均有不同程度缓解,术中及术后均无穿孔、出血、吞咽困难等严重并发症出现。术后6个月及12个月随诊显示,DeMeester评分[18.00(5.83,54.75)分、16.30(4.38,60.00)分]较术前[105.00(60.80,147.70)分]相比显著下降(Z=-3.72,P<0.001;Z=-3.82,P<0.001),pH<4时间百分比[8.80(6.10,11.80)%、8.95(5.15,10.90)%]较术前[31.15(16.75,54.75)%]相比显著下降(Z=-3.72,P<0.001;Z=-3.72,P<0.001),长反流次数[7.90(4.93,11.75)次、6.90(4.00,10.75)次]较术前[33.00(13.00,43.00)次]相比显著下降(Z=-3.82,P<0.001;Z=-3.58,P<0.001),酸反流次数[(14.86±8.71)次、(12.93±5.51)次]较术前[(30.42±17.99)次]相比显著下降(t=5.88,P<0.001;t=4.79,P<0.001),食管下括约肌静息压[9.70(5.80,19.58)mmHg、11.70(5.40,19.78)mmHg]较术前[4.70(3.25,7.00)mmHg]相比显著升高(Z=-2.84,P<0.001;Z=-3.10,P<0.001),GERD‑Q评分[(10.00±2.01)分、(9.43±1.74)分]较术前[(15.34±1.51)分]相比显著下降(t=8.90,P<0.001;t=9.87,P<0.001),GERD‑HRQL评分[7.00(5.00,7.75)分、6.00(5.75,8.25)分]较术前[13.50(11.00,21.25)分]相比显著下降(Z=-3.73,P<0.001;Z=-3.72,P<0.001),GERI[(2.26±1.58)%、(2.07±1.17)%]较术前[(5.72±2.27)%]相比显著下降(t=8.92,P<0.001;t=9.86,P<0.001)。术后6、12个月随访,患者满意度[68.00%(15/25),84.00%(21/25)]较术前[0.00%(0/25)]明显增加(Z=-4.63,P<0.001;Z=-6.48,P<0.001)。结论 初步小样本研究表明,EMBL治疗难治性胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝疗效显著,安全可行。

    Abstract:

    Objective To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of endoscopic multi-band ligation (EMBL) in the management of refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (RGERD) combined with esophageal hiatal hernia (HH). Methods This study was a prospective, multicenter, small-sample cohort study. Patients who were diagnosed as having RGERD combined with HH at Inner Mongolia Medical University Cancer Hospital and Inner Mongolia Medical University Hospital from January 2020 to June 2022 were selected to undergo EMBL. The 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring and high-resolution manometry (HRM) related indicators, gastroesophageal reflux index (GERI), gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire (GERD-Q) scores, and gastroesophageal reflux disease health-related quality of life (GERD-HRQL) scores were compared before and after the operation. The patient satisfaction and complications were also investigated. Results A total of 25 patients were included, all of whom were successfully treated with EMBL. Reflux symptoms were relieved to varied degrees in all patients. There were no serious complications during or after the operation, such as perforation, bleeding, and dysphagia. Postoperative follow-up at 6 and 12 months showed a significant decrease in DeMeester scores [18.00 (5.83, 54.75) points, 16.30 (4.38, 60.00) points] compared to preoperative baseline [105.00 (60.80, 147.70) points, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.82, P<0.001]. The percentage of time of pH<4 [8.80 (6.10, 11.80)%, 8.95 (5.15, 10.90)%] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [31.15 (16.75, 54.75)%, Z=-3.72, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], the number of long refluxes [7.90 (4.93, 11.75) times, 6.90 (4.00, 10.75) times] significantly decreased compared to the baseline [33.00 (13.00, 43.00) times, Z=-3.82, P<0.001; Z=-3.58, P<0.001], and the number of acid refluxes (14.86±8.71 times, 12.93±5.51 times) significantly decreased compared to before (30.42±17.99 times, t=5.88, P<0.001; t=4.79, P<0.001). Lower esophageal sphincter resting pressure [9.70 (5.80, 19.58) mmHg, 11.70 (5.40, 19.78) mmHg] was significantly higher compared to before [4.70 (3.25, 7.00) mmHg, Z=-2.84, P<0.001; Z=-3.10, P<0.001]. GERD-Q scores (10.00±2.01 points, 9.43±1.74 points) were significantly higher compared to before (15.34±1.51 points, t=8.90, P<0.001; t=9.87, P<0.001), GERD-HRQL scores [7.00 (5.00, 7.75) points, 6.00 (5.75, 8.25) points] significantly decreased compared to preoperative baseline [13.50 (11.00, 21.25), Z=-3.73, P<0.001; Z=-3.72, P<0.001], and GERI (2.26%±1.58%, 2.07%±1.17%) significantly decreased compared to before (5.72%±2.27%, t=8.92, P<0.001; t=9.86, P<0.001). At 6 and 12 months postoperative follow-up, patient satisfaction [68.00% (15/25), 84.00% (21/25)] significantly increased compared to before [0.00% (0/25), Z=-4.63, P<0.001; Z=-6.48, P<0.001]. Conclusion Preliminary small-sample study has shown that EMBL is safe, reliable and effective for the treatment of RGERD with HH.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

贾雪,胡海清.内镜下多环套扎治疗难治性胃食管反流病合并食管裂孔疝的临床初探(含视频)[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2025,42(3):229-235.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-11-06
  • 最后修改日期:2025-02-15
  • 录用日期:2024-01-30
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-02-17
  • 出版日期:
您是第位访问者

通信地址:南京市鼓楼区紫竹林3号《中华消化内镜杂志》编辑部   邮编:210003

中华消化内镜杂志 ® 2025 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司