Abstract:Objective To probe into the comparison of curative effect of ERCP+LC and LC+LCBDE for Cholecystolithiasis with Choledocholithiasis. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted between January 2015 and January 2018 in patients who were suffered from Cholecystolithiasis with Choledocholithiasis were divided into four groups. The patients of group A who were 29 cases were operated with ERCP and EST firstly, and then were operated with LC. The patients of group B who were 29 cases were operated with LC and LCBDE, and then T tube was imbedded in the Choledocholithiasis. The patients of group C who were 17 cases were operated with LC and LCBDE, the Choledocholithiasis was satured directly after the removal of the stone. The patients of group D who were 29 cases were operated with LC and LCBDE, finished with biliary stent imbedded and common bile duct sutured at the same time. The time of operation, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, hospitalization expenses, evacuation time, postoperative biliary fistula, the rate of postoperative residual stone and the rate of postoperative calculi recurrence were compared between four groups. Results The hospitalization expenses of group D were less obviously than group A(P<0.05). But the time of operation, hospital stay , intraoperative blood loss, hospitalization expenses of group D has no statistical differences(P>0.05) with group B and C. The occurrence rate of postoperative biliary fistula of group D was lower than group C(P<0.05). Conclusion The application of biliary stent after LC and LCBDE with laparoscopy combined with cholecystectomy not only will not prolong the operation time and hospital stay, Increase hospitalization expenses, but also prevent the occurrence of pancreatitis and biliary fistula, and avoid the need for a second surgical procedure.